Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave and Sandi Reynolds's avatar

I realize you are "just" reporting, but is there a point? If you fully subscribe to separation of church and state then what they are proposing becomes a very natural outcome from that concept. I don't know, or pretend to know Canada's federal laws on this, nor how they might impact a given state choosing to go their own route, and be more restrictive. It seems to me that sooner or later this would become a US law, if the religious right does not successfully challenge it. Unfortunately the Roberts court, it seems to me, is chipping away at the wall of separation. It also seems to me that the unasked question in all of this presentation is: Do you really think everyone else (especially those who don't believe as you do) should be funding your teaching whatever sectarian beliefs you happen to hold? If your answer is no, then this becomes a reasonable separation of church and state. If your answer is yes, then you don't really believe in separation of church and state.

I realize that for many more years than I can count, the SDA Church has gladly accepted Government monies to help their budgets and to expand their growth. Also, SDA students have accepted government scholarships to attend Adventist schools. I suspect the day will come when we will have to choose between holding to our beliefs and potentially having to close a lot of our schools, or succumbing to government regulation on what, how, who, etc. you can teach your beliefs to if you accept their monies.

Dave

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?